Ewing
Ewing v. BF Advance, LLC
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20213:20-cv-01748California2,281 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTON EWING, Case No. 20-cv-01748-BAS-WVG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR STAY AND FOR
BF ADVANCE LLC AND AN ORDER REQUIRING
JOSEPH COHEN, PLAINTIFF TO POST BOND AS A
VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendants. (ECF No. 7); (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
AMEND (ECF No. 11);
AND
18 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF No. 14) 20 Mr. Ewing brings this Complaint pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. (ECF No. 1.) He has not served the Defendants. Nonetheless, Defendant BF Advance (“Defendant”) has filed a Motion to Stay the Action and to have Plaintiff post a bond as a vexatious litigant before proceeding. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff opposes, and Defendant replies. (ECF Nos. 10, 12.) Plaintiff also files a Motion…