Ewing

Ewing v. BF Advance, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20213:20-cv-01748California2,281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTON EWING, Case No. 20-cv-01748-BAS-WVG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER: 12 v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR STAY AND FOR

BF ADVANCE LLC AND AN ORDER REQUIRING

JOSEPH COHEN, PLAINTIFF TO POST BOND AS A

VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

Defendants. (ECF No. 7); (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

AMEND (ECF No. 11);

AND

18 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF No. 14) 20 Mr. Ewing brings this Complaint pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. (ECF No. 1.) He has not served the Defendants. Nonetheless, Defendant BF Advance (“Defendant”) has filed a Motion to Stay the Action and to have Plaintiff post a bond as a vexatious litigant before proceeding. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff opposes, and Defendant replies. (ECF Nos. 10, 12.) Plaintiff also files a Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.