Radcliff

Radcliff v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20213:20-cv-01555California3,929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 DAVID RADCLIFF, individually and on Case No.: 3:20-cv-01555-H-MSB behalf of all others similarly aggrieved,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO REMAND v. 19 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC [Doc. No. 26.] 20 COMPANY, a California corporation; SEMPRA ENERGY, a California

corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, 22 inclusive, 23 Defendants.

Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff David Radcliffe’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand this case back to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. (Doc. No. 26.) On January 25, 2021, Defendants San Diego Gas and Electric Co. (“SDG&E”) and Sempra Energy (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a response in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. No. 31.) On February 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed a reply. (Doc. No. 34.) On February 3, 2021, the Court, in its discretion pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), submitted the motion on the parties’ papers. (Doc. No. 33.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.