Sanders

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEENA SANDERS, an individual Case No.: 20-cv-85-AJB-BLM

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ RESPECTIVE RESPONSES TO v. THE COURT’S ORDER TO 14 SHOW CAUSE (Doc. No. 14) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY; OFFICER SAKAMOTO; and DOES 1-10,

Defendants. 18

20 Before the Court are the parties’ respective responses to the Court’s Order to Show 21 Cause (“OSC”) (Doc. No. 14). (Doc. Nos. 15, 16.) In the OSC, the Court ordered Plaintiff 22 to show cause as to why her previously dismissed Monell claims based on ratification and 23 a failure to train should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 24 14 at 2.) Additionally, the Court ordered Defendants to show cause as to why their answer 25 should not be considered untimely. For the reasons set forth, the Court DISMISSES, 26 without leave to amend, Plaintiff’s previously dismissed Monell claims, and ACCEPTS 27 Defendants’ answer. 28 I. PLAINTIFF’S…