(PC) Richardson v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20213:20-cv-00356California2,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARDSON, Donn, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0356-WQH-RBM

CDCR #AC-9306,

ORDER DISMISSING SECOND

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINTOR vs. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM 14 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)

& 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

W.L. MONTGOMERY; M. POLLARD;

L. HATFIELD; E. NUNEZ; A.

BARRIOS; D. POLLARD; P.

SAUCEDO; D. WHITE; J. SPAICH;

H. LIU,

Defendants. 20 21 22 I. Procedural History On February 24, 2020, Donn Richardson (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) located in Crescent City, California and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1). In his original Complaint, Plaintiff claimed prison officials at Calipatria State Prison (“CAL”), along with California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) officials in Sacramento violated his right to due process when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.