McCullock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT McCULLOCK, Case No.: 19-cv-2110-DMS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER PROVIDING NOTICE

vs. TO PRO SE PRISONER OF

REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING

N. SCHARR, et al.,

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants. PURSUANT TO

KLINGELE / RAND

17 This notice is required to be given to Plaintiff pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988):1 Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 35, requesting a judgment in their favor. A Motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a Motion for Summary Judgment. Generally, summary judgment will be granted when there is no genuine dispute

26 1 Klingele and Rand together require the district court “as a bare minimum,” to ensure that a pro se…