Hill

Hill v. Alpine Sherriff Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20213:18-cv-02470California590 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PERCY HILL also known as PERCY Case No.: 18cv2470-CAB-MDD

EDWIN STOCKTON

ORDER: (1) ADOPTING REPORT

Plaintiff, AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. v. No. 72]; (2) GRANTING MOTION

FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS

ALPINE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et [Doc. No. 69]; AND DISMISSING al.,

CASE WITH PREJUDICE

16 Defendants.

18 On November 5, 2020 , Defendants filed a motion for terminating sanctions. [Doc. 19 No. 69.] On December 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed an opposition. [Doc. No. 71.] On 20 January 21, 2021, Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin prepared a Report and 21 Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that the motion for terminating sanctions be 22 granted and the case be dismissed with prejudice. [Doc. No. 72.] The Report also ordered 23 that any objections were to be filed by February 9, 2021. [Report at 11.] To date, no 24 25 26 1 Defendants caption their motion as a motion to dismiss pursuant to FRCP 41(b), or alternatively to compel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.