Lucas

I. BACKGROUND

23 Plaintiff Miguel Lucas filed this motion against Defendants County of San Diego, 24 Mark Gustafson, and DOES to 101 on September 3, 2020. [Doc. No. 1.] After 25 26 1 Pursuant to the FAC, DOES 1 to 10 refers to “the other individual Sheriff’s Deputies who are responsible for Plaintiff’s injuries.” [Doc. No. 6 ¶ 17.] Plaintiff also refers to such Defendants as “DOE 28 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s original complaint on December 1, 2020, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on December 22, 2020, thereby mooting Defendants’ motion. [Doc. Nos. 5, 6.] The FAC asserts claims for: (1) Violation of the Fourteenth Amendment by Objective Indifference, brought against Defendants Gustafson and DOES 1-10 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (2) Violation of the Fourteenth Amendment by Inadequate Mental Health Program, brought against the County of San Diego under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (3) Negligence, brought against all Defendants; and (4) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, brought against all Defendants. [Doc. No. 6 ¶¶ 20–84.] Plaintiff alleges in the FAC that on June 4, 2019,…