Navarro
Williams v. Navarro
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20213:18-cv-01318-DMS-BGSCalifornia1,914 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
□ 5 ‘ .
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01318-DMS-RBM
CDCR #AG-2394, . □
Plaintife ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR "| APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 14 O. NAVARRO, N.A. GARSILASO,
E. ESTRADA, C. BAGNOL, F. LEWIS,
16 || L. HALL, DR. R. KATYAL, □ DR. S. KRITTMAN, C. TISCORNIA, CONNIE, McGUIRRE, DR. D. LAFLER, 18 || A. SOTO, T. BYRD-HUNT, A. RUELES, M. RODRIGUEZ AND J. MEJIA, Defendants. 20 [Doc. 91] 21 I. INTRODUCTION Lance Williams (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 24 || filed a “Motion Request for App[ointmen]t of Counsel.” (Doc. 91.) Liberally construing 25 || this filing, it is a Motion for Appointment of Counsel (“Motion”). (Doc. 91); see Blaisdell 26 ||…