Reed
Reed v. Paramo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-cv-00361-JLS (DEB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS [DKT. NO. 218]; AND RESETTING DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT
Defendants. CONFERENCE 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Request for Sanctions against Defendants. Dkt. No. 218. Plaintiff contends that the Court should sanction Defendants because: (1) they failed to arrange accommodations for two scheduled settlement conferences; (2) Defendants’ failure inconvenienced the Court; (3) if Plaintiff caused similar delays, he believes the Court would sanction Plaintiff; and (4) Plaintiff had to forego two days of library time for the scheduled settlement conferences. Id. at 1–4. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Request for Sanctions and RESETS the Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) for March 16, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. A court…