Maharaj

Maharaj v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20213:20-cv-00064California8,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DEVANAN MAHARAJ, individually Case No. 20-cv-00064-BAS-LL and on behalf of all similarly situated employees of Defendants in the State ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S of California, MOTION TO DISMISS OR,

ALTERNATIVELY, TO STAY

Plaintiff, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT v. (ECF No. 23) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 14 Defendants. 15 Before the Court is Defendant Charter Communications, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss, or, Alternatively, to Stay Plaintiff Devanan Maharaj’s First Amended Complaint (“Motion”). (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff opposes and Defendant replies. (ECF Nos. 25, 28.) The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ.LR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons explained below, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Devanan Maharaj (“Plaintiff” or “Maharaj”) initiated this action in San Diego Superior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.