Bavin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VLADIMIR BAVIN, Case No.: 19-cv-779-WQH-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. ANDREW SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Vladimir Bavin (ECF No. 19), the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) (ECF No. 22), and the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 26) recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, deny the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and remand this matter for further administrative proceedings. The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a magistrate judge are set forth in Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . .…