Holmes
Holmes v. Estock
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No.: 16cv2458-MMA(BLM) CHARLES HOLMES,
Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING MANDATORY
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
v. DR. ESTOCK, et al., Defendants. On February 16, 2021, Judge Michael M. Anello issued an Order Denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 145. In the order, Judge Anello directed the parties to “jointly contact the chambers of the assigned magistrate judge, within ten ( 10) business days of the date this Order is filed, for the purpose of scheduling a settlement conference at the convenience of the magistrate judge.” Id. at 53. On February 24, 2021, after consulting with Plaintiff’s counsel, defense counsel, Ms. Lisa Freund, contacted Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major’s Chambers regarding counsels’ availability for a settlement conference. In light of Judge Anello’s order and Ms. Freund’s representations, the Court issues the following orders: 1. The Court will hold a videoconference Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”)…