Reynolds

Reynolds v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20213:19-cv-01358California1,605 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 DEANNA R., Case No.: 19-CV-1358 W (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER

U.S.C. § 2412 [DOC. 21]

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s application for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1). [Doc. 21.] The Court decides the matter without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s application. 26 I. BACKGROUND On May 26, 2015, Plaintiff Deanna R. (“Plaintiff”) protectively filed applications for Title II Disability Insurance Benefits and Title XVI Supplemental Security Income. (Administrative Record (“A.R.”) [Doc. 11-3] 115.) On October 1, 2015, Plaintiff’s applications were denied on initial review and were denied again upon reconsideration on May 5, 2016. (Id.) On February…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.