Kernan
(PC) Riley v. Kernan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN E. RILEY, Case No.: 16cv405-MMA-LL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
S. KERNAN, et al.,
Defendants. [ECF No. 90]
Currently before the Court is a Joint Motion for Determination of a Discovery Dispute (“Joint Motion”) in which Plaintiff seeks to compel interrogatory responses and document subpoenas. ECF No. 90. Specifically, Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses to Interrogatory Nos. 1 to 18 propounded to Defendant Kernan. ECF No. 90 at 5–8, see also ECF No. 90-1 (Plaintiff’s Interrogatories, attached as Exhibit 1 to the Joint Motion). Plaintiff also seeks to compel responses to ten subpoenas, nine of which were served on Defendant Kernan and one to Norah O’Donnell. ECF No. 90 at 4, 8; see also ECF No. 90-2 (Plaintiff’s Subpoenas, attached as Exhibit 2 to the Joint Motion). For the reasons set forth below, the Court …