Victorino

Victorino v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20213:16-cv-01617California3,993 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS VICTORINO and ADAM Case No.: 16cv1617-GPC(JLB) TAVITIAN, individually, and on behalf of 12 other members of the general public ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S similarly situated, MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiffs,

v. [Dkt. No. 355.] FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 17 Defendant.

19 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s May 8, 20 2020 order denying its motion to modify the class definition and to limit the certified 21 class to those purchasers who still own the Class Vehicles. (Dkt. Nos. 355.) Plaintiff 22 filed a response and Defendant replied. (Dkt. Nos. 359, 362.) The Court finds that the 23 matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Civ. R. 24 7.1(d)(1). Based on the reasoning below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion for 25 reconsideration. 26 / / / 27 Background Plaintiff Carlos Victorino (“Victorino” or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.