Lemke

Lemke v. Jander

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20213:20-cv-00362California3,461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD G. LEMKE, Case No.: 20-CV-362 JLS (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

GARY D. JANDER, (ECF No. 9) Defendant. 16 Presently before the Court is Defendant Gary Jander’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 9). Plaintiff Richard Lemke, proceeding pro se, filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 11), and Defendant filed a Reply in Support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 12). The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 13. Having carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” ECF No. 8), the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s claims stem from a probate action in the San Diego Superior Court’s Central Probate Division, Case No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.