Pressley

Pressley v. Pacheco

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20213:17-cv-01715California2,494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LAMAR PRESSLEY, Case No. 17cv1715-MMA (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

vs. PACHECO’S UNOPPOSED

MOTION FOR TERMINATING

SANCTIONS

M. PACHECO, Defendant. [Doc. No. 71] 17 Plaintiff Michael Lamar Pressley, a former California inmate proceeding pro se, alleges violations of his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by Defendant M. Pacheco. See Doc. No. 41. Defendant moves for terminating sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 and Civil Local Rules 83.1 and 83.11. See Doc. No. 71. In the alternative, Defendant requests that the Court dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and Civil Local Rule 41.1 based on Plaintiff’s failure to litigate. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendant’s motion and the time in which to do so has expired. See generally CIVLR 7.1.e; see also Doc. No. 74. The Court took the matter under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.