Mendell

Mendell v. American Medical Response, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20213:19-cv-01227California2,548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MENDELL, Case No. 19-cv-01227-BAS-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO SEAL (ECF No. 80)

AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE,

INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND In this putative class action that Plaintiff Michael Mendell brings against American Medical Response, Inc. (“AMR”), the parties each filed several motions to file under seal certain documents in support of or opposition to Mendell’s motion for class certification. (ECF Nos. 47, 59, 65.) The Court denied the motions without prejudice and directed the parties to reapply for a sealing order. (ECF No. 75.) AMR filed an amended motion to file documents under seal. (ECF No. 80.) The Court finds the motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). // // // II. LEGAL STANDARD “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.