Arrant
Arrant v. Zambrano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN RAY ARRANT Case No.: 3:20-cv-01220-JLS-AGS CDCR No. K98602,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
Plaintiff, RECONSIDERATION vs.
M. ZAMBRANO, et al.,
15 Defendants. (ECF No. 14) 16 17 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Melvin Ray Arrant’s Second Motion for Reconsideration, in which he asks the Court to reconsider its December 11, 2020 Order dismissing his case. (“2d Mot. Recon.,” ECF No. 14.) On June 29, 2020, Plaintiff filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Compl.”), together with a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF Nos. 1–3.) On September 9, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP, denied his TRO, and dismissed the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b). (ECF No. 6.) The Court granted Plaintiff sixty (60) days to file an amended complaint. (Id.) /// On September 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a document entitled…