Rose

Rose v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20213:21-cv-00267California1,910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES E. ROSE, JR., Case No.: 21-cv-0267-CAB-BGS aka “Jason E. Roman, III”

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND DISMISSING PETITION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Petitioner attests that he is unemployed, living on a small fixed income and food stamps and has insufficient funds on account to afford the $5.00 filing fee. (ECF No. 2.) The Court therefore GRANTS Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, and allows Petitioner to prosecute the above-referenced action as a poor person without being required to prepay fees or costs and without being required to post security. The Clerk of / / / 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.