Amezquita
Amezquita v. Hough
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE G. AMEZQUITA, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01461-AJB-KSC
Plaintiff,
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
v. FOR ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
D. HOUGH, et al.,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Defendants. APPOINT COUNSEL
[Doc. Nos. 47, 49] 18 Plaintiff Jose Amezquita (“plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1983. See Doc. Nos. 1, 25. Plaintiff alleges that defendants Armenta, Hough and Downs were deliberately indifferent to a serious risk of harm to him, in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. See Doc. No. 25 at 3, 6-8. Presently before the Court is defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Doc. No. 47. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 72.1, the…