Amezquita

Amezquita v. Hough

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20213:19-cv-01461California7,305 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE G. AMEZQUITA, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01461-AJB-KSC

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

v. FOR ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

D. HOUGH, et al.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Defendants. APPOINT COUNSEL

[Doc. Nos. 47, 49] 18 Plaintiff Jose Amezquita (“plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1983. See Doc. Nos. 1, 25. Plaintiff alleges that defendants Armenta, Hough and Downs were deliberately indifferent to a serious risk of harm to him, in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. See Doc. No. 25 at 3, 6-8. Presently before the Court is defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Doc. No. 47. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 72.1, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.