Torres
Torres v. Diaz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARDO TORRES, Case No.: 19-cv-01964-LAB-JLB
Petitioner,
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S
v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
RALPH DIAZ, et al.,
Respondents. [ECF No. 47] 16 Before the Court is Petitioner Eduardo Torres’s second Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (ECF No. 47.) Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF Nos. 1; 21.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED without prejudice. I. LEGAL STANDARD The Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not extend to federal habeas corpus actions filed by state prisoners. McCleskly v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 495 (1991). Petitioners do not have an absolute right to counsel for habeas corpus actions. Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722, 728 (9th Cir. 1986). …