King

King v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20213:20-cv-01935California2,112 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANNETTE KING, Case No.: 20-cv-01935-H-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S COSTCO WHOLESALE

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN

CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 10, AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND Defendants. 16 [Doc. No. 13.] 17 (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A

THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

20 [Doc. No. 11.] 21 On January 26, 2021, Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation filed a motion for 22 leave to file a third-party complaint. (Doc. No. 11.) On February 5, 2021, Plaintiff Annette 23 King filed a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 13.) To date, 24 no opposition had been filed to either motion. A hearing on the two motions is currently 25 scheduled for March 8, 2020. The Court, pursuant to its discretion under Civil Local Rule 26 7.1(d)(1), determines the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument, 27 submits the motions on the parties’ papers,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.