Baker

Baker v. Battad

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20213:19-cv-01438California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMIE LEE BAKER, III, Case No.: 19-CV-1438-AJB (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE R. BATTAD AND O. ARIZAGA, Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is a prisoner pro se action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 24, 2020, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 15.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint, and directed Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint by August 1, 2020. (Id.) Having missed the deadline, and seeing no further activity, on January 25, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to why Plaintiff’s case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 18.) The Court warned that failure to show cause by February 26, 2021 will result in the dismissal of Plaintiff’s case. (Id.) That date has come and passed, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.