R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20213:20-cv-01290California494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO Case No.: 20-CV-1290 JLS (WVG)

COMPANY.; R.J. REYNOLDS VAPOR

12 COMPANY.; and SANTA FE ORDER (1) GRANTING NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY., PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED

INC., MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A

SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs, AND (2) ORDERING v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; and HELEN

N. ROBBINS-MEYER, in her official

(ECF No. 37) capacity as the County of San Diego’s Chief Administrative Officer, 19 Defendants.

21 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 37). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d), “the court may, on just terms, permit a party to serve a supplemental pleading setting out any transaction, occurrence, or event…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.