Booth
Booth v. Kane
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20213:20-cv-02543California1,066 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMMY MAE BOOTH, Case No.: 20cv2543-GPC(KSC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
v. LEAVE TO AMEND AND DENYING
MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT
JOY CHRISTINE KANE, MARIKA RAI
AS MOOT
BARBER, JOHN H GITLIN, JOHN
GITLIN, JOSEPH C. FARAH,
[DKT. NO. 5.] PROMISE PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT, REAL PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT WINCHESTER, SURF
AND SEA PROPERTIES, SURF & SEA
PROPERTIES INC, REAL PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT SAN DIEGO
SHORES, MR. MARK D. FEINBERG,
MS. JEAN MARJORIE HEINZ, MR.
MARK DAVID FEINBERG,
22 Defendants.
24 On September 2, 2020, a miscellaneous case was opened when Plaintiff Tammy 25 Mae Booth filed a document and paid a filing fee of $47.00 in Case No. 20mc980. 26 Plaintiff’s filed document is entitled, “Unrebutted Administrative Affidavit of Specific 27 Negative Averment” but does not indicate what she is seeking administratively from the 28 Clerk’s Office. (Dkt. No. 1.) On November 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed a request for…