Booth

Booth v. Kane

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20213:20-cv-02543California1,066 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMMY MAE BOOTH, Case No.: 20cv2543-GPC(KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH

v. LEAVE TO AMEND AND DENYING

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT

JOY CHRISTINE KANE, MARIKA RAI

AS MOOT

BARBER, JOHN H GITLIN, JOHN

GITLIN, JOSEPH C. FARAH,

[DKT. NO. 5.] PROMISE PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT, REAL PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT WINCHESTER, SURF

AND SEA PROPERTIES, SURF & SEA

PROPERTIES INC, REAL PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT SAN DIEGO

SHORES, MR. MARK D. FEINBERG,

MS. JEAN MARJORIE HEINZ, MR.

MARK DAVID FEINBERG,

22 Defendants.

24 On September 2, 2020, a miscellaneous case was opened when Plaintiff Tammy 25 Mae Booth filed a document and paid a filing fee of $47.00 in Case No. 20mc980. 26 Plaintiff’s filed document is entitled, “Unrebutted Administrative Affidavit of Specific 27 Negative Averment” but does not indicate what she is seeking administratively from the 28 Clerk’s Office. (Dkt. No. 1.) On November 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed a request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.