Parchem
Parchem v. Superior Court of Stanislaus County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GARY JOSEPH PARCHEM, JR.,
Case No. 20-01257 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS
COUNTY,
Defendant.
17 Plaintiff, a state inmate at the Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be addressed in a separate order. 21 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a
26 1 The matter was initially dismissed on May 15, 2020, after Plaintiff failed to respond to the Clerk’s notice regarding the failure to pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis 27 application in the time provided. Dkt. Nos. 2, 6. The Court reopened the matter on June 1, prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a …