Salmen
Salmen v. California Department of Correction Rehabilitation
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20213:20-cv-02088California1,456 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SALMEN, CDCR #BK-5881, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02088-GPC-KSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO
v. APPOINT COUNSEL; (2) DENYING MOTION TO ALERT FBI; and (3) CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
CORRECTIONS AND
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
REHABILITATION; S. ROBERTS; M.
DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT CHAU
GLYNN; J. HODGES; A. KENDALL;
DR. CHAU; H. FRANKLIN; S.
[Doc. Nos. 24, 25, 27]
ANDERSON; A. SHITTU; S. GATES,
18 Defendants.
Plaintiff Justin Salmen (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 7. The Court recently accepted for filing plaintiff’s omnibus document seeking (among other things) the appointment of counsel and requesting that the Court “alert the FBI of located evidence of corruption” at Richard J. Donovan correctional facility (“RJD”). See Mot.…