Salmen

Salmen v. California Department of Correction Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20213:20-cv-02088California1,456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SALMEN, CDCR #BK-5881, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02088-GPC-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO

v. APPOINT COUNSEL; (2) DENYING MOTION TO ALERT FBI; and (3) CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

CORRECTIONS AND

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

REHABILITATION; S. ROBERTS; M.

DIRECTED TO DEFENDANT CHAU

GLYNN; J. HODGES; A. KENDALL;

DR. CHAU; H. FRANKLIN; S.

[Doc. Nos. 24, 25, 27]

ANDERSON; A. SHITTU; S. GATES,

18 Defendants.

Plaintiff Justin Salmen (“plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 7. The Court recently accepted for filing plaintiff’s omnibus document seeking (among other things) the appointment of counsel and requesting that the Court “alert the FBI of located evidence of corruption” at Richard J. Donovan correctional facility (“RJD”). See Mot.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.