Alvarez

Alvarez v. LaRose

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20213:20-cv-00782California427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACINTO VICTOR ALVAREZ, JOSEPH Case No.: 20-cv-00782-DMS (AHG)

BRODERICK, MARLENE CANO, JOSE

CRESPO-VENEGAS, NOE ORDER OVERRULING

GONZALEZ-SOTO, VICTOR LARA- DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION TO

SOTO, RACQUEL RAMCHARAN, DISCOVERY ORDER

GEORGE RIDLEY, MICHAEL JAMIL

SMITH, LEOPOLDO SZURGOT, JANE DOE, on behalf of themselves and those 16 similarly situated, 17 Plaintiffs-Petitioners, 18 v. 19 CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, Senior Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center, et al., 21 Defendants-Respondents. 22 23 This case comes before the Court on Defendants’ objection to Magistrate Judge Alison Goddard’s September 18, 2020 Amended Order Resolving Joint Motion for Determination of Rule 34 Site Inspection Discovery Dispute, Granting in Part and Denying in Plaintiff Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Rule 34 Site Inspection. Plaintiffs filed an opposition to the objection, and Defendants filed a reply. After reviewing these briefs, the Magistrate 1 || Judge’s Order and the relevant case law, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.