Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20213:18-cv-00361California1,652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS

vs. (1) FOR RECONSIDERATION, (2) TO COMPEL LEGAL DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,

SUPPLIES, AND (3) TO REPLACE

Defendants. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16 (ECF Nos. 200, 206, 208)

Presently before the Court are three filings from Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed: (1) Plaintiff’s Responses to Defendants’ Declarations of R. Blahnik and D. Nowroozian (“Response”), supported by a Declaration from Plaintiff (“Decl.”) as well as Plaintiff’s Request for Judge Sammartino to Order Defendants to Supply Him with Legal Supplies (“Supplies Req.”) (ECF No. 200); (2) Plaintiff’s Change of Venue Request (“Venue Req.,” ECF No. 206); and (3) Plaintiff’s Complaint of Prejudice by Magistrate in Denying his Motion for Reconsideration (“Compl.,” ECF No. 208). The Court construes Plaintiff’s filings as motions: (1) for reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Daniel E.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.