Wolf

Smith v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20213:20-cv-01409California3,403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 G. SMITH, Case No.: 20cv1409-JAH (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND

DISMISSING IN PART

DANIEL WOLF and PAUL

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

BEDINGTON,

COMPLAINT [Doc. No. 7]; AND Defendant. (2) GRANTING MOTION TO FILE 15 ELECTRONICALLY [Doc. No. 8] 16 INTRODUCTION On July 22, 2020, G. Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint seeking damages against Daniel Wolf and Paul Bedington (“Defendants”) for seven California state law claims: Breach of Contract, Assault, Trespass, Trespass to Chattels, Conversion, Abuse of Process, and Unjust Enrichment. [Doc. No. 1]. On July 22, 2020, Plaintiff also filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Doc. No.2]. On October 19, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time of Service, Doc. No. 3, and a Motion to File Electronically. [Doc. No. 4]. On October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.