Mulalley

Mulalley v. Starbucks Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20213:21-cv-00032California3,431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASHLEY MULALLEY; SABRINA D. Case No.: 21-cv-0032-GPC-DEB EDWARDS; and SARAH T. BEKELE,

ORDER:

Plaintiffs, 13 v. (1) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF

BEKELE’S SECOND AND FOURTH

STARBUCKS CORPORATION;

CAUSES OF ACTION AGAINST STARBUCKS CORPORATION d/b/a

DEFENDANT HUDDLESTON; AND

STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY;

STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY;

(2) REMANDING THE CASE SHAREE HUDDLESTON; and DOES

through 10, inclusive, [ECF Nos. 5, 6, 8] Defendants. 20 Before this Court are three motions: (1) Defendant Sharee Huddleston’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Sarah T. Bekele’s Second and Fourth Causes of Action (“MTD”), ECF No. 5; (2) Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration (“MTC”), ECF No. 6; and (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (“MTR”), ECF No. 8. Upon considering the motions and related papers, the Court GRANTS the MTD but also REMANDS the case back to state court, without ruling on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.