Emrit

Emrit v. Secretary Betsy DeVos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20213:20-cv-00266California1,335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Case No.: 20cv266-JAH-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SECRETARY BETSY DEVOS et al,

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

Defendant. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [Doc. No. 2]; AND

2. DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 1915(e)(2)

19 On February 10, 2020, Ronald Satish Emrit (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a 20 complaint along with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), pursuant to 21 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Doc. No. 2. After a careful review of the record and for the reasons 22 set forth below, the Court (1) GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed IFP, [Doc. 23 No. 2]; and (2) DISMISSES the complaint, [Doc. No. 1] without leave to amend.

I. Plaintiff’s IFP Motion

25 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 26 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 27 $400. See 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.