McMorrow
McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20213:17-cv-02327California10,785 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK MCMORROW, et al., Case No. 17-cv-2327-BAS-JLB
Plaintiffs,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
DAUBERT MOTION (WEIR)
Defendant. (ECF No. 147);
16 (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S DAUBERT MOTION (DENNIS) (ECF No. 148);
(3) DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’
DAUBERT MOTION (MCFADDEN &
WILCOX) (ECF No. 151);
22 (4) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’
DAUBERT MOTION (SIMONSON)
24 (ECF No. 152); AND 25 (5) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION (ECF No. 137).
28 Consumers in California and New York, who purchased belVita breakfast biscuits, brought this putative class action against Defendant Mondelēz Global LLC (MDLZ), alleging that MDLZ labeled the breakfast biscuits as “nutritious,” despite…