Strojnik

Strojnik v. San Diego Farah Partners, L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20213:20-cv-00358California3,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER STROJNIK Case No.: 20cv358-LAB (BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND

SAN DIEGO FARAH PARTNERS,

ORDER DECLINING TO

L.P.

EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL Defendant. JURISDICTION

17 Plaintiff Peter Strojnik, Sr. filed his pro se complaint1 bringing claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and supplemental state law claims. Strojnik claims that accessibility barriers at the Holiday Inn Express in Downtown

22 1 Although Strojnik is proceeding pro se, it is clear he is very familiar with ADA litigation, including Article III standing. Strojnik is a former lawyer whose practice 24 included ADA litigation. Before being disbarred in connection with the hundreds of disability-related cases he filed for clients, he began filing similar cases on his own behalf. See Strojnik v. HPTRI Corp., 2020 WL 6827765, slip op. at *2 (D. Ariz. Nov. 26 20, 2020) These have …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.