Inigo

Inigo v. Express Movers, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20213:18-cv-02844California1,477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO INIGO, Case No.: 3:18-cv-2844-BEN-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES

EXPRESS MOVERS, INC., a Hawaii

Corporation, d/b/a Movers Hawaii, 15 Defendant. [ECF No. 50] 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff Fernando Inigo’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees. ECF No. 50. Defendant Express Movers, Inc. (“Express Movers”) remains unrepresented by counsel and did not file any briefing addressing this Motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND This case concerns a shipment of household goods and a vehicle from Hawaii to California. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Inigo filed a Complaint against Express Movers on December 17, 2018. Id. He initially sought $39,827.00 in damages, which he alleged represented the value of the items unlawfully withheld by Express Movers as the result of a dispute over shipping costs. Id. at 9. On April 22,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.