Carolino

Carolino v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20213:20-cv-01535California1,693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY CAROLINO, et al., Case No.: 3:20-cv-1535 W (DEB) Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS [DOC. 2] WITH LEAVE TO CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., AMEND CERTAIN CLAIMS Defendants. 16 Defendants City of San Diego, Jose Mendez and Brad Keyes move to dismiss and strike. Plaintiffs Anthony Carolino and David Carolino have filed an opposition in which they concede many of Defendants’ arguments, but seek leave to amend. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d.1). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion [Doc. 2] WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as to certain claims. 23 I. BACKGROUND According to the Complaint, on August 24, 2019 at about 7:50 p.m., Rose Dawson called 911 seeking assistance from the Psychiatric Emergency Response Team (“PERT”). 27 28 (Compl. [Doc. 1-3] ¶ 8. ) Dawson reported that her newphew, Dennis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.