Escamilla Avina v. Patenaude & Felix, APC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20213:20-cv-00166California8,429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE ESCAMILLA AVINA, on Case No. 20-cv-00166-BAS-MDD behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ORDER: 12 Plaintiff, (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT v. PATENAUDE & FELIX, APC AND CREDIT CORP. SOLUTIONS,

PATENAUDE & FELIX, APC; CREDIT INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

CORP. SOLUTIONS, INC.; THOMAS (ECF No. 16);

FLYNN,

AND Defendants. (2) DENYING DEFENDANT THOMAS

FLYNN’S MOTION TO DISMISS

(ECF No. 17) 19 Before the Court are two Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Patenaude & Felix, APC and Credit Corp. Solutions, Inc. (the “Entity Defendants”) and individual Defendant Thomas Flynn. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) Plaintiff opposes both Motions (ECF Nos. 19, 20) and Defendants reply. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) The Court finds both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.