Valdez

Richardson v. Valdez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20213:20-cv-01760California1,699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONN RICHARDSON Case No.: 3:20-cv-01760-BAS-JLB CDCR # AC9306,

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR v. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) O. VALDEZ “LT.” S.H.O.,

E. CHAVARRIA “AW”, C.O.O.,

15 Defendants. 16 On September 8, 2020, Donn Richardson (“Richardson” or “Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) in Crescent City, California and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On December 7, 2020, Richardson paid the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). (ECF No. 3.) In its December 17, 2020 Order, the Court denied the motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot, dismissed Richardson’s Complaint for failing to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), and granted him leave to file an 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.