Schwerdtfeger

Schwerdtfeger v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20213:19-cv-02255California1,003 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL JOSEPH Case No.: 19-CV-2255 JLS (JLB)

SCHWERDTFEGER,

ORDER (1) ADOPTING IN

Plaintiff, FULL REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 23); 14 (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S PARAMO, Warden; R. BUCKEL, Assoc. MOTION TO REVOKE Warden Business Services; and

PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS

UNKNOWN CDCR AGENT,

STATUS (ECF NO. 14); (3) DENYING

Supervisor of Plant Operations, AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION Defendants. TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (ECF

NO. 9); AND (4) DECLINING TO

ADOPT AS MOOT REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 18)

AND DENYING AS MOOT

OBJECTIONS THERETO (ECF NO. 19)

(ECF Nos. 9, 14, 18, 19, 23)

Presently before the Court is Defendant R. Buckel’s Motion to Revoke Plaintiff’s in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) Status and Dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.