Vaughn

Vaughn v. Hampton

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20213:19-cv-01687California6,330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 SHARIFFE VAUGHN, Case No.: 19-cv-01687-H-KSC

Plaintiff, ORDER: v. 15 (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DEREK A. HAMPTON, correctional DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS sergeant, F. CANLAS, correctional

CUEVAS, GOMEZ, HAMPTON,

officer, J. CUEVAS, correctional officer,

ORSATT, AND SOTO’S MOTION

B. GOMEZ, correctional officer, J.

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND ORSATT, correctional officer, and T.

SOTO, correctional officer, (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT Defendants. CANLAS’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Doc. No. 42.]

On December 23, 2020, Defendants B. Gomez, T. Soto, F. Canlas, J. Cuevas, D. Hampton, and J. Orsatt (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 42.) On January 25, 2021, Plaintiff Shariffe Vaughn (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition in response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 47.) On 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.