Vaughn
Vaughn v. Hampton
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20213:19-cv-01687California6,330 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 SHARIFFE VAUGHN, Case No.: 19-cv-01687-H-KSC
Plaintiff, ORDER: v. 15 (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DEREK A. HAMPTON, correctional DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS sergeant, F. CANLAS, correctional
CUEVAS, GOMEZ, HAMPTON,
officer, J. CUEVAS, correctional officer,
ORSATT, AND SOTO’S MOTION
B. GOMEZ, correctional officer, J.
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND ORSATT, correctional officer, and T.
SOTO, correctional officer, (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT Defendants. CANLAS’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Doc. No. 42.]
On December 23, 2020, Defendants B. Gomez, T. Soto, F. Canlas, J. Cuevas, D. Hampton, and J. Orsatt (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 42.) On January 25, 2021, Plaintiff Shariffe Vaughn (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition in response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 47.) On 28 …