Brumbach

Brumbach v. Hyatt Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20213:20-cv-02231California6,887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 MICHAEL D. BRUMBACH, on Case No.: 20-cv-2231-WQH-KSC behalf of himself and all others 14 similarly situated, ORDER 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation doing business as Manchester Grand 19 Hyatt San Diego; and DOES 1- 100, inclusive, Defendants. HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Michael D. Brumbach. (ECF No. 7). I. BACKGROUND On October 9, 2020, Plaintiff Michael D. Brumbach filed a Class Action Complaint against Defendants Hyatt Corporation d/b/a Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (“Hyatt”) and Does 1 through 100 in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Diego. (Ex. A to Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1-2 at 6). In the Complaint, Brumbach alleges that Defendants violated California’s wage and hour laws with respect to hourly, non-exempt employees at the Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego (“Manchester Grand”). Brumbach alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.