Sekerke

Sekerke v. Hoodenpyle

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20213:19-cv-00035California3,838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE, Case No.: 19-cv-35-WQH-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. DEPUTY HOODENPYLE, Sheriff Deputy; DEPUTY MORGAN, Sheriff 15 Deputy; DEPUTY BURNS, Sheriff Deputy; DEPUTY MS. D’AUGUSTINO, Sheriff Deputy; CPL. REYES, Sheriff 17 Deputy; DEPUTY ANGUILO, Sheriff Deputy; B. STUBBS, Sheriff Deputy; JOHN DOE, Sheriff Deputy; and THE

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

20 Defendants. 21 HAYES, Judge: 22 The matters before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended 23 Complaint filed by Deputy Defendants Pablo Reyes, Jeffrey Burns, Joshua Hoodenpyle, 24 Jianna D’Agostino, Miguel Angulo, and Brittany Stubbs (ECF No. 30) and the Report and 25 Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 36). 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Keith Wayne Sekerke is a prisoner currently incarcerated at the San Diego Central Jail and proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.