Carter

Carter v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20213:21-cv-00324California952 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 LAWANDA M. CARTER, Case No. 21-cv-00324-BAS-DEB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

UNITED STATES,

(ECF No. 2) Defendant. 15 On February 22, 2021, Plaintiff Lawanda M. Carter, proceeding pro se, commenced this action against the United States. (ECF No. 1.) The same day, Plaintiff also filed an application seeking leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, also known as proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s application to proceed IFP. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, an indigent litigant who is unable to pay the fees required to commence a legal action may petition a court to proceed without making such prepayment. The determination of indigency falls within the district court’s discretion. 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.