Pontier

Pontier v. GEICO Insurance

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20213:21-cv-00199California552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PONTIER, Case No.: 21cv0199-GPC(DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

v. LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT

GEICO INSURANCE, MARYLAND

CORPORATION; FARMERS INC.,

CORPORATION; JP MORGAN CHASE

BANK, N.A., A DELAWARE

CORPORATION; JOSEPH DANG, AN

INDIVIDUAL,

18 Defendants.

20 On March 9, 2021, Plaintiff submitted an amended complaint against Defendant 21 GEICO which the Court rejected. (Dkt. No. 38.) 22 The original complaint was filed in the District of Nevada on August 5, 2020. 23 (Dkt. No. 1.) On November 16, 2020, Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase 24 Bank”) filed a motion to dismiss, or to transfer venue. (Dkt. No. 7.) On November 19, 25 2020, Defendant Geico Insurance (“Geico”) filed its motion to dismiss, or in the 26 alternative, to transfer the case to the Southern District of California. (Dkt. No. 9.) 27 Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion for extension of time to file a response to the 28 1 || motions to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.