Salmen

Salmen v. California Department of Correction Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20213:20-cv-02088California1,621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:20-cv-2088-GPC-KSC

JUSTIN SALMEN,

CDCR #BK-5881, ORDER

13 Plaintiff, (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 14 v. MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT CHAU’S ANSWER

CALIFORNIA DEP’T OF

CORRECTIONS AND

AND

REHABILITATION; S. ROBERTS;

M. GLYNN; J. HODGES; A. KENDALL;

(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S CHAU; H. FRANKLIN; S. ANDERSON;

MOTION FOR

A. SHITTU; S. GATES,

RECONSIDERATION Defendants.

21 22 I. Procedural History On October 22, 2020, Plaintiff Justin Salmen, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) In addition, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (See ECF No. 2.) On November 2, 2020, the Court GRANTED Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP but 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.