Richardson v. San Diego Sheriff's Office
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL D. RICHARDSON, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02435-DMS-JLB Booking #19731938,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 12 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
SAN DIEGO SHERIFF’S OFFICE;
[ECF No. 2]
GEORGE BAILEY DETENTION;
A. APEZ, Deputy/Corrections (SDSO);
AND
OFFICER H., Deputy/Corrections 16 (SDSO); CREW SHIFT, 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR Deputy/Corrections (SDSO),
FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM
Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 19 20 Plaintiff Daniel D. Richardson, detained at the County of San Diego Sheriff Department’s George F. Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”), and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. While short on specifics, Richardson names the County Sheriff’s Office, GBDF, two Sheriff’s Department deputies, and an entire “Crew Shift” as parties, and contends they committed acts of racial discrimination…