Richardson v. San Diego Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20213:20-cv-02435California3,857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL D. RICHARDSON, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02435-DMS-JLB Booking #19731938,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 12 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

SAN DIEGO SHERIFF’S OFFICE;

[ECF No. 2]

GEORGE BAILEY DETENTION;

A. APEZ, Deputy/Corrections (SDSO);

AND

OFFICER H., Deputy/Corrections 16 (SDSO); CREW SHIFT, 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR Deputy/Corrections (SDSO),

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 19 20 Plaintiff Daniel D. Richardson, detained at the County of San Diego Sheriff Department’s George F. Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”), and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. While short on specifics, Richardson names the County Sheriff’s Office, GBDF, two Sheriff’s Department deputies, and an entire “Crew Shift” as parties, and contends they committed acts of racial discrimination…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.