Golden Eye Media USA, Inc. v. Trolley Bags UK Ltd

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20213:18-cv-02109California5,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant GOLDEN EYE MEDIA USA, INC., a California 3 || corporation (“Plaintiff”) brings this action for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement 4 || against Defendants/Counterclaimants TROLLEY BAGS UK LTD, a corporation of the 5 || United Kingdom (“Trolley Bags”); and BERGHOFF INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Florida 6 || corporation (“Berghoff”) (collectively, “Defendants”). ECF No. 1. Before the Court are the following motions: (1) Defendants’ Motions in Limine Nos. 8 || 1 through 6, ECF No. 103, and (2) Plaintiff and Counterclaimants Farzan Dehmoubed and 9 || Jennifer Douvall’s motions in limine Nos. 1 through 3, ECF Nos. 104-106. Both motions 10 || were submitted on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1) Rule 78(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 113. After considering ||the papers submitted, supporting documentation, and applicable law, the Court GRANTS ||IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's motions in limine while DENYING 14 |] Defendants’ motions in limine as outlined below.

BACKGROUND

This matter arises out of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.