Petconnect Rescue, Inc. v. Salinas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20213:20-cv-00527California715 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETCONNECT RESCUE, INC., et al., Case No.: 20-cv-527-H (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX DAVID SALINAS, et al.,

PARTE APPLICATION FOR

Defendants. RECONSIDERATION;

16 (2) DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR

RECONSIDERATION BE FILED

UNDER SEAL; AND

19 (3) ISSUING ORDERS TO SHOW

CAUSE

21 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for Reconsideration of Order Granting Defendants Ray Rothman and Alysia Rothman’s Motion for Protective Order. Dkt. No. 107. The Court has reviewed the pleadings1 and finds that Plaintiffs’ Application does not meet the standards for reconsideration. See Civil Local Rule 7.1(i). Plaintiffs’ 26 27 28 showing that the Rothmans’ home address is one of multiple addresses associated with public records filings of the Rothmans’ businesses does not undermine their privacy interest in their home address or entitle Plaintiffs to publicize it in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.