Petconnect Rescue, Inc. v. Salinas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETCONNECT RESCUE, INC., et al., Case No.: 20-cv-527-H (DEB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX DAVID SALINAS, et al.,
PARTE APPLICATION FOR
Defendants. RECONSIDERATION;
16 (2) DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR
RECONSIDERATION BE FILED
UNDER SEAL; AND
19 (3) ISSUING ORDERS TO SHOW
CAUSE
21 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for Reconsideration of Order Granting Defendants Ray Rothman and Alysia Rothman’s Motion for Protective Order. Dkt. No. 107. The Court has reviewed the pleadings1 and finds that Plaintiffs’ Application does not meet the standards for reconsideration. See Civil Local Rule 7.1(i). Plaintiffs’ 26 27 28 showing that the Rothmans’ home address is one of multiple addresses associated with public records filings of the Rothmans’ businesses does not undermine their privacy interest in their home address or entitle Plaintiffs to publicize it in…