Carreno
Carreno v. 360 Painting, LLC.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 DEBORAH CARRENO CASE NO. 19cv2239-LAB-BGS 11 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
vs.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS [Dkt. 39] 360 PAINTING, LLC, et al.
14 Defendants. 15 16 And related counterclaim. 17 18 On March 16, 2020, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Deborah Carreno’s claims for unjust enrichment and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing against Defendant 360 Painting, LLC (“360”). Carreno then filed her First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). In addition to amending the two previously-dismissed claims, the FAC includes a claim for breach of oral contract and six additional claims, all of which are based on the theory that 360 negligently or intentionally misrepresented that its “rent-a-license” business model complied with California law and would permit Carreno to operate a painting franchise by renting a contractor’s license, rather than having one 360 has moved to dismiss the FAC in its entirety. (Dkt. 39.) The FAC hasn’t corrected the…